Pengaruh Good Governance Dan Whistleblowing System Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Dengan Risiko Sanksi Pajak Sebagai Moderasi (Studi Empiris Pada Wajib Pajak Di Kabupaten Sleman)
Abstract
Tax compliance still needs to be improved by encouraging the implementation of transparent taxation, namely the transparency of tax management in all areas, both administrative and management of the use of funds derived from tax revenue. The real effort that must be done to implement the transparency is through the bureaucracy reform movement in the service system and tax administration that is through the implementation and implementation of Good Governance. Good governance is a well-executed organizational governance, by carrying out the principles of openness, justice and accountability in order to achieve the goals of the organization. The problems that will be studied by the researcher is a social and dynamic problem. Therefore, the researcher chooses to use quantitative research method to determine how to find, collect, process and analyze the data of the research result, so that this research is expected to give input for the need of strengthening of harmony between Good Corporate Governance and Whistleblowing System and the need to create system or policies and operational procedures of taxation sanction risk required for tax compliance implementation. The results showed that there is influence between the implementation of Good Corporate Governance to tax compliance, there is influence between Whistleblowing System on tax compliance, there is no influence between the implementation of Good Corporate Governance to tax compliance if moderated by the Taxation Sanction variable and there is influence between the application of Whistleblowing System against tax compliance if it is moderated by the Taxation Sanction variable.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alijoyo, A., dan Subartono, Z., (2004), Komisaris Independen: Penggerak Praktik GCG di Perusahaan, PT. Indeks, Jakarta.
Ghozali, I., (2013), Structural Equation Modeling Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi Dengan Lisrel 8.80 (Edisi 3), Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Ilyas. B dan Burton, (2013), Hukum Pajak, Edisi 6, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
La Porta, R. et al, (1998), Corporate Ownership Around the World, Journal of Finance, 471-577.
Lukviarman, N., (2016), Corporate Goernance, Era Adicitra Intermedia, Solo.
Mardiasmo, (2016), Perpajakan Edisi terbaru 2016, Andi, Yogyakarta.
Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor PER-22/PJ/2011 tanggal 19 Agustus 2011.
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 101 Tahun 2000.
Pujiwododo, D., (2016). Persepsi Sanksi Perpajakan Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi, Jurnal Online Insan Akuntan, Vol 1, No 1, Juni 2016, 92 – 116.
Rahman, A., (2009), Hubungan Sistem Administrasi Perpajakan Modern Dengan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak, Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, Vol VI. No 1.
Rustiyaningsih, S., (2010), Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Madiun, Vol 2. No 11.
Sasmita, S.N.A., (2013), Pengaruh Pemahaman Wajib Pajak, Pelayanan Fiskus, Kesadaran Wajib Pajak, dan Sanksi Perpajakan terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Pemilik Usaha Kecil Menengah dalam Laporan Kewajiban Perpajakan di Semarang (Studi UMKM di Semarang), Jurnal Akuntansi, Universitas Brawijaya, Vol 7. No 9.
Sisingoringo, W., (2015), Pengaruh Good Governance dan Whistleblowing System Terhadap Kepauhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Dengan Risiko Sanksi Pajak Sebagai Variabel Moderating (Studi Empiris Terhadap Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Di Kota Bekasi), Jurnal Akuntansi, Volume XIX, No. 02, Mei; 207-224.
Surat Edaran Direktur Jendral Pajak Nomor SE-11/PJ/2011.
Tricker, B., (2004), Corporate Governance : Principles, Policies and Practices,University Press Oxford, Oxford.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/bti.91099
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International