Pengaruh Keadilan Distributif Kompensasi dan Keadilan Prosedural Kompensasi terhadap Employee Engagement dan Kinerja Karyawan PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/bti.101112Keywords:
Distributive Justice Compensation, Procedural Justice Compensation, Employee Engagement, Employee Performance.Abstract
The purpose of this research are to know and analyze the influence of distributive justice compensation to employee engagement of PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia, knowing and analyzing the effect of procedural fairness of compensation on employee engagement of PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia, knowing and analyzing the influence of distributive justice compensation on the performance of employees of PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia, knowing and analyzing the effect of procedural fairness of compensation on employee performance of PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia, and know and analyze the influence of employee engagement on the performance of employees of PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia. This research are 93 permanent employees of PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia. Sampling technique using Purposive sampling is sampling method where the sample is taken based on certain criteria, which is only permanent employee of PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia numbering 93 people. Data analysis method using Linear Regression Model Structural Equation Model (SEM) AMOS in this research is used to know and analyze impact. The results of the analysis is identified most respondents assess Distributive Justice Compensation Employees known PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia, High (Mean 4.17). Identified most of the respondents judge Procedural Justice Compensation Employees remain PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia, High (Mean 3.98). Known most respondents rate Employee Engagement Employees Employees permanent PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia, Height (Mean 4.02). Known most respondents rate Employee Performance PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia, Height (Mean 4.08). The results of the analysis show that Distributive Justice Equity significantly affects Employee Engagement Employees PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia (value of probability t-count (0.000) <Level of Significant (0,05)), Procedural Justice Compensation has significant effect to Employee Engagement Employee PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia (value of probability t-count (0.000) <Level of Significant (0,05)), Distributive Justice Compensation has significant effect to Employee Performance of PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia (value probability t-count (0.040) <Level of Significant (0,05)), Justice Prosedural Compensation has a significant effect on Employee Performance Employees PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia (probability value t-count (0,000) <Level of Significant (0,05)). This can be interpreted, if the Justice Procedural Compensation increases, then Employee Performance Employees PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia has increased, Employee Engagement has a simultaneous influence on Employee Performance Employees PT. Ameya Livingstyle Indonesia (probability value t-count (0,000) <Level of Significant (0,05)).References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Atmojo,S.T. dan Tjahjono,H.K. 2016. Pengaruh Keadilan Distributif dan Prosedural Kompensasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dan Kinerja Paramedis di Rumah Sakit. JBTI. Vol.7 No.1.
Yohanes,B. dan Wardani,P.R., 2005. Peran Keadilan Distributif, Keadilan Prosedural, dan Keadilan Interaksional Perusahaan terhadap Komitmen Karyawan pada Perusahaan (Studi pada Perusahaan X). Jurnal Psikologi Vol. 3 No.2.
Colquitt, J.A., Wesson. M. J., Porter, Christopher O.L.H., Conlon, Donald E., dan Yee Ng., K. 2013. Justice at the Millenium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 years of Organizational Justice Research. Journal of Applied Psychology. 86(3). pp: 425-445.
Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A., dan Chen, P.Y. 2007. Using Social Exchange Theory to Distinguish Procedural from Interactional Justice. Group and Organization Management. 27. 324–351.
Clayton, S. dan Opotow, S. 2003. Justice and Identity: Changing Perspectives on What is fair. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4): 298-310.
Gilliland, S.W. 1994. Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to a Selection System. Journal of Applied Psychology. 79(5). 691-701.
Greenberg, J., dan Baron, RA., 2003. Behavior in Organizations. Eightr Edition, Prentice Hall, New Delhi.
Handoko, T.H., 2008. Manajemen,. Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Hasibuan, Malayu SP. 2003. Organisasi dan Motivasi, Dasar Peningkatan Produktivitas. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Irawan, Luthfi. 2015. Pengaruh Keadilan Distributif dan Keadilan Prosedural Pada Komitmen Afektif dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Mediasi (Studi pada Karyawan PT. Tanjung Kreasi Parquet Industry Temanggung). Skripsi. Jurusan Manajemen. Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Kadaruddin, Abd., Rahman Kadir, Ria Mardiana Y., 2007. Pengaruh Keadilan Distributif, Keadilan Prosedural Dan Keadilan Interaksional Terhadap Kepuasan Kepuasan Pegawai Pajak di Kota Makassar. Publikasi Penelitian. Manajemen dan Keuangan, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Hasanuddin.
Lewis. R. Philipus. 2013. Keadilan Distributif, Keadilan Prosedural, Keadilan Interaksional Kompensasi dan Komitmen Karyawan. JRMB. Volume 8. No.1.
Luthans, Fred. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi. Yogyakarta: CV Ardi Ofsett.
Lind, E.A. & Tyler, T.R. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Planum.
Mangkuprawira S., dan Vitalaya HA. 2007. Manajemen Mutu Sumber Daya Manusia. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Margaretha, Meily dan T. Elisabeth C.S., 2012. Keadilan Prosedural dan Keadilan Distributif sebagai Prediktor Employee Engagement. Jurnal Manajemen. Vol.12, No.1.
Masterson, S.S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B.M. and Taylor, M.S. 2000. Integrating Justice and Social Exchange: the Differing Effects of Fair Procedures and Treatment on Work Relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4); 738-748.
Murtaza, G., Shad, I., Shahzad, K., Shah, M. K., dan Khan, N. A. 2011. Impact of Distributive and Procedural Justice on Employees’Commitment: A Case of Public Sector Organization of Pakistan. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences. 29: 73-80
Prawirosentono, Suyadi. 2008. Kebijakan Kinerja Karyawan. Edisi Pertama. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Ruslan, Rosady. 2004. Metode Penelitian Public Relations dan Komunikasi. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rahayu, Sri. 2005. SPSS Versi 12.00. Dalam Riset Pemasaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Robbins, P. Stephen, & Coulter. 2008. Perilaku Organisasi Konsep, Kontroversi, Aplikasi. Alih Bahasa: Hadyana Pujaatmaka dan Benyamin Molan; Editor: Agus Widyantoro). Jakarta: Prenhallindo.
Simamora, Henry. 2006. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Tiga. Yogyakarta: STIE YKPN.
Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Sutrisna, I.W.W., dan Agoes, G.R., 2015. Pengaruh Keadilan Distributif, Prosedural, dan Interaksional terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasi Pada Paramedis di Rumah Sakit TK II Udayana Denpasar. Publikasi Penelitian. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana (Unud) Bali.
Tjahjono, H.K., 2005. Praktik-praktik Manajemen SDM Strategik; Pengujian Universalistik dan Kontijensi dalam Menjelaskan Kinerja Organisasional. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi Kinerja. 9(2):123-134.
Tjahjono, H.K., 2008. Studi Literatur Pengaruh Keadilan Distributif dan Keadilan Prosedural pada Konsekuensinya dengan Teknik Meta Analisis. Jurnal Psikologi. Volume 35(1). 21-40, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta.
Tjahjono, H.K.,2014. The Fairness Of Organization’s Performance Appraisal, Social Capital and the Impact Toward Affective Commitment. International Journal of Administrative Science & Organization. 21(3): 173-179.
Tyler, T.R. & Blader, S.L. 2003. The Group Engagement model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 7(4):349-361.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).