Perbandingan Keakuratan Penentuan Usia Antara Metode Demirjian, Cameriere, dan Blenkin-Taylor

Authors

  • Erwin Setyawan Departemen Radiologi, Program Studi Kedokteran Gigi, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Dimas Setiyanto Departemen Radiologi, Program Studi Kedokteran Gigi, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Latifa Wahyudi Putri Departemen Radiologi, Program Studi Kedokteran Gigi, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/di.v10i2.12972

Keywords:

Blenkin-Taylor, Cameriere, Demirjian, Panoramic, Usia

Abstract

Banyaknya korban meninggal yang disebabkan oleh bencana massal atau kejadian lainnya perlu dilakukan proses identifikasi untuk mengetahui identitas para korban. Proses identifikasi salah satunya dapat dilakukan menggunakan teknik dental records dalam menentukan identitas individu. Metode penentuan usia menggunakan dental records yang paling sering digunakan adalah metode Demirjian, serta terdapat metode baru dalam penentuan usia yaitu metode Cameriere dan metode Blenkin-Taylor. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan keakuratan penentuan usia antara metode Demirjian, Cameriere, dan Blenkin-Taylor pada pasien di RSGM UMY. Metode pada penelitian ini adalah observasional analitik dengan jumlah sampel adalah 95 foto radiograf dari pasien berusia 4-15 tahun yang berkunjung ke Rumah Sakit Gigi dan Mulut Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta (RSGM UMY) pada bulan januari hingga desember 2017. Analisis data pada penelitian ini menggunakan uji statistik Chi-Square Test dan crosstabulation menggunakan software spss. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa metode Demirjian memiliki keakuratan sebesar 66.31% (63 sampel), metode Cameriere memiliki keakuratan sebesar 51.57% (49 sampel) dan metode Blenkin-Taylor sebesar 54.74% (52 sampel). Analisis statistik ketiga metode tersebut tidak memiliki perbedaan yang bermakna dalam keakuratan penentuan usia pasien. Kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode Demirjian, Cameriere, dan Blenkin-Taylor tidak memiliki perbedaan keakuratan dalam penentuan usia.

References

Corradi LM, Travassos DV, Coste SC, Moura RNV de, Ferreira EF e. Identifying missing people: the contribution of forensic dentistry and DNA. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2017;13; 46(6):313–8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.02817

Garg Y, Bhaskar DJ. Forensic Dentistry: An Aid in Criminal Investigation. ForensicDent.2015;1(6):4.

Tandaju CF, Siwu J, Hutagalung BSP. Gambaran pemeriksaan gigi untuk identifikasi korban meninggal di Bagian Kedokteran Forensik dan Medikolegal RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Manado tahun 2010 – 2015. E-GiGi.2017;5(1):96-99. https://doi.org/10.35790/eg.5.1.2017.15534

Chandramala R, Sharma R, Khan M, Srivastava A. Application of Kvaal’s Technique of Age Estimation on Digital Panoramic Radiographs. Dentistry; 2012;2:142.

Halilah T, Khdairi N, Jost-Brinkmann P-G, Bartzela T. Age estimation in 5-16-year-old children by measurement of open apices: North German formula. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;293:103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.09.022

Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A New System of Dental Age Assessment. Hum Biol. 1973;45(2): 211-227.

Cameriere R, Pacifici A, Pacifici L, Polimeni A, Federici F, Cingolani M, et al. Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth with Bayesian calibration approach. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;258:50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.11.005

Blenkin M, Taylor J. Age estimation charts for a modern Australian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2012; 221(1):106–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.04.013

Baylis S, Bassed R. Precision and accuracy of commonly used dental age estimation charts for the New Zealand population. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;277 :223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.011

Ajmal M, Assiri KI, Al-Ameer KY, Assiri AM, Luqman M. Age estimation using third molar teeth: A study on southern Saudi population. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012;4(2):63–65. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.109886

Apriyono DK. Metode Penentuan Usia Melalui Gigi dalam Proses Identifikasi Korban. Cermin Dunia Kedokt. 2016;43(1):71–74.

Rai B, Kaur J, Cingolani M, Ferrante L, Cameriere R. Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth: an Indian formula. Int J Legal Med. 2010;124(3):237–241. 10.1007/s00414-010-0427-7

Tompe A, Sargar K. X-Ray Image Quality Assurance. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.

Sarkar S, Kailasam S, Mahesh Kumar P. Accuracy of estimation of dental age in comparison with chronological age in Indian population--a comparative analysis of two formulas. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(4):230–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2012.09.007

Galić I, Vodanović M, Cameriere R, Nakaš E, Galić E, Selimović E, et al. Accuracy of Cameriere, Haavikko, and Willems radiographic methods on age estimation on Bosnian-Herzegovian children age groups 6-13. Int J Legal Med.2011;125(2):315–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0515-8

Soliman A, De Sanctis V, Elalaily R, Bedair S. Advances in pubertal growth and factors influencing it: Can we increase pubertal growth? Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18(1):53–62. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.145075

Tabakcilar D, Bundak R, Gencay K. Dental Age in Precocious and Delayed Puberty Periods. Eur J Dent.2021; 15(3):539–545. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726156

Downloads

Published

2021-11-28

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021): November

Section

Articles

License

License

Insisiva Dental Journal : Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Insisiva (IDJ) is licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license. You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Copyright

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).