Animal Conceptual Metaphors in Kotowaza: A Cognitive Linguistic Study
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al Hakimi, I. M., & Nishfullaily, S. (2015). Terjemahan peribahasa tentang binatang dalam Doraemon no Kotowaza Jiten (Thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada).
Arfianty, R. (2023). Komparatif kotowaza bahasa Jepang dan bahasa Indonesia berunsur nama hewan: Kajian semantik. KIRYOKU, 7(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v7i1.35-49
Ehineni, T. (2017). From conceptual metaphors to cultural metaphors: Metaphorical language in Yoruba proverbs and praise poems. Language Matters, 48(3), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2017.1406533
Hadi, L. F., & Nurhadi, D. (2018). Kajian makna dan nilai budaya peribahasa Jepang dan Indonesia yang menggunakan unsur nama binatang. Hikari: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Jurusan Bahasa dan Sastra Jepang, 6(2), 1-9. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/hikari/article/view/25151
Isam, H., & Awal, N. M. (2012). Nilai setia dari perspektif prosodi semantik: Analisis berbantu data korpus. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(2).
Jalaluddin, N. H., Sultan, F. M. M., Hamid, N. M., Khairudin, S., & Radzi, H. (2011). Persepsi politik dalam dialek Kedah: Analisis semantik kognitif. Jurnal Linguistik, 12(1).
Kadir, P. M., Pebriani, Y., & Rusyan, S. (2022). Perbandingan peribahasa Jepang dengan peribahasa Sunda terkait hubungan manusia: Kajian semantik kognitif. JENTERA: Jurnal Kajian Sastra, 11(2), 388-398. https://doi.org/10.26499/jentera.v11i2.5266
Kinanti, K. P., & Rachman, A. K. (2019). Metafora tumbuhan dalam peribahasa Indonesia (Kajian semantik kognitif). BELAJAR BAHASA: Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(1), 68-81.
Kusuma, D. (2022). Peribahasa Sunda sebagai refleksi pola pikir masyarakat Sunda. AL-BURHAN, 12(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.56322/.v12i1.3
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). George Lakoff and Mark Johnsen (2003) metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago press. Noter om layout: Innholdsfortegnelse i Word: Journal of Philosophy.
Lu, W. L. (2019). Time, tense and viewpoint shift across languages: A multiple-parallel-text approach to “tense shifting” in a tenseless language. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(2), 377-397. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0039
Mafrukha, S., Firmansyah, D. B., & Stovia, A. (2021). Animal elements on Japanese Kotowaza and the implementation of Japanese socio-cultural values: a cognitive linguistics point of view. Japanese Research on Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 3(2), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.33633/jr.v3i2.4599
MappingⅩ, A. L. C., & ARIMI, S. Contested Wisdom in Indonesian and Japanese Proverbs.
Maulana, I. P. A. P., & Putra, I. B. G. D. (2021). Metafora konseptual kasta dalam masyarakat Bali: Kajian linguistik kognitif. PRASI, 16(02), 92-104. https://doi.org/10.23887/prasi.v16i02.37578
Nasir, M. R. B. M., & Subet, M. F. (2019). Analisis semantik inkuisitif peribahasa bahasa melayu (Inquisitive semantics analysis in the Malay language proverbs). Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 227-253. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2019.16.2.9
Ramlan, M. N. B. (2021). Comparative ethnolinguistics on metaphorical interpretations in Japanese kotowaza and Malay proverbs. IZUMI: Japanese Language, Literature and Culture Journal, 10(2), 221-238. https://doi.org/10.14710/izumi.10.2.221-238
Toan, L. N. (2019). Lexical expressions of path motion in Vietnamese: A perspective from Cognitive Linguistics. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 1(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3420865
Trahutami, S. W. I. (2018). Hubungan manusia dan etos kerja dalam kotowaza Jepang. KIRYOKU, 2(4), 197-202. https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v2i4.24-29
Yohani, A. M. (2016). Kotowaza dalam kajian linguistik kognitif: Penerapan gaya bahasa sinekdok. Izumi, 5(2), 24-32. http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/izumi
Van Trijp, R. (2015). Cognitive vs. generative construction grammar: The case of coercion and argument structure. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(4), 613-632. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0074
Wahab, H. A., Abdullah, I. H., Mis, M. A., & Salehuddin, K. (2016). Analisis eufemisme kematian masyarakat Melayu Sarawak dari perspektif semantik kognitif. GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies, 16(2), 53-71. http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/801
Yanti, N. N. E., Nurita, W., & Andriyani, A. A. D. (2022). Fungsi dan makna kotowaza kata hewan pada manga Doraemon no kotowaza jiten. Jurnal Daruma: Linguistik, Sastra dan Budaya Jepang, 2(3), 62-72. https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/daruma/article/view/3731
Yohani, A. M. (2015). Kotowaza dalam kajian linguistik kognitif: Penerapan gaya bahasa metafora. Seminar Nasional Strategi Indonesia Kreatif Menghadapi ASEAN Economic Community 2015, Universitas Widyatama, Bandung.
Yohani, A. M. (2017). Kotowaza dalam kajian linguistik kognitif: Penerapan gaya bahasa metonimi. Repository Universitas Widyatama. http://repository.widyatama.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/9356
Zakiyah, M., Fiaji, N. A., & Zulvarina, P. (2018). Semantik prototipe korupsi: Kajian linguistik kognitif. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 11, 163-174. https://doi.org/ 10.26858/retorika.v11i2.5137
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jjlel.v8i1.20843
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Iffatu Masrura Al Hakimi
Editorial Office
Journal of Japanese Language Education and Linguistics
KH Ibrahim Building (E6) First Floor, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Jalan Brawijaya, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Yogyakarta, 55183
email: jjlel.pbj@umy.ac.id
Phone: +62 274 387656, ext. 459
Department of Japanese Language Education, Faculty of Language Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.