Analysis of Japanese Proverbs Using the Words “Mizu” and “Ame” and Sundanese Proverbs Using the Words “Cai” and “Hujan”

Authors

  • Fahmi Akmal Pratama Department of Japanese Language Education, Faculty of Language and Literature Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Dedi Sutedi Department of Japanese Language Education, Faculty of Language and Literature Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Juju Juangsih Department of Japanese Language Education, Faculty of Language and Literature Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jjlel.v9i2.26767

Keywords:

Contrastive analysis, semantic, mizu, ame, cai

Abstract

This comparative research delves into the analysis of kotowaza in Japanese that incorporate the lexical elements 'mizu' and 'ame' , alongside paribasa in Sundanese containing the equivalent words 'cai' and 'hujan' . The primary focus of this study is to explore the layers of semantic meaning and understand the cultural context underpinning the formation of these idiomatic expressions in both languages. Through a contrastive approach, this research seeks to highlight fundamental similarities and differences in how both cultures conceptualize and utilize the concepts of water and rain in their verbal expressions. By carefully examining the connotative and idiomatic meanings inherent in each proverb, this study aims to enrich a more comprehensive understanding of Japanese kotowaza and Sundanese paribasa. The implications of this analysis are expected to provide significant insights into the linguistic specificities and cultural values embedded within each system of proverbs.

References

Amalia, A. R. (2017). The importance of needs analysis for English for specific purposes at elementary school teacher department of University of Muhammadiyah Sukabumi. UHAMKA International Conference on ELT and CALL, 1-13.

Aminuddin. (2008). Semantik pengantar studi makna. Bandung: Sinar Baru.

Ainun, N., Mulyadi, M., & Pujiono, M. (2022). Conceptual metaphor in Japanese idiom with the word mizu'water'. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 5(1), 49-60.

Ardyan, E., Boari, Y., Akhmad, A., Yuliyani, L., Hildawati, H., Suarni, A., Ifadah, E., & Judijanto, L. (2023). Metode penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif: Pendekatan metode kualitatif dan kuantitatif di berbagai bidang. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Badudu, J. S. (2008). Kamus peribahasa. Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara.

Chaer, A. (2003). Linguistik umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Djiwandono, P. I., & Yulianto, W. E. (2023). Penelitian kualitatif itu mengasyikkan: Metode penelitian untuk bidang humaniora dan kesusastraan. Penerbit Andi.

Hutabarat, D. F. (2017). Etika masyarakat Jepang dalam berinteraksi sosial. Kertas Karya. Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Sumatera Utara

Jaizah, T. F. (2019). Makna denotasi dan konotasi peribahasa Jepang yang terbentuk dari kata neko. Thesis. Universitas Diponegoro.

Ramadhan, M. (2021). Metode penelitian (AA Effendy (ed.). Cipta Media Nusantara.

Sudaryat, Y. (2016). Pakeman basa Sunda, Ulikan idiomatik Sunda. Bandung: Pustaka Jaya.

Sudaryat, Y., Permana, R., & Nurhadi, J. (2019). Ecopedagogical values in traditional idiomatic expressions. Second Conference on Language, Literature, Education, and Culture ICOLLITE 2018, 380-385. Atlantis Press.

Sunarni, N., & Johana, J. (2019). Makna budaya leksikon “Mizu” yang tercermin dalam peribahasa Jepang dan padanannya dalam peribahasa Sunda. Journal of Japanese Language Education and Linguistics, 3(1), 14-34. https://doi.org/10.18196/jjlel.3122

Tarigan, H. G. (2009). Pengajaran semantik. Bandung: Angkasa.

Yohani, A. M. (2017). Kotowaza dalam kajian linguistik kognitif: Penerapan gaya bahasa sinekdok. IZUMI, 5(2), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.14710/izumi.5.2.24-32

Downloads

Published

2025-08-29

How to Cite

Akmal Pratama, F., Sutedi, D., & Juangsih, J. (2025). Analysis of Japanese Proverbs Using the Words “Mizu” and “Ame” and Sundanese Proverbs Using the Words “Cai” and “Hujan”. Journal of Japanese Language Education and Linguistics, 9(2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.18196/jjlel.v9i2.26767

Issue

Section

Articles