Analisis Tindak Tutur Menyatakan Pendapat dalam Drama Seri “1 Rittoru No Namida”

Authors

  • Asteria Permata Martawijaya Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing YAPARI ABA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jjlel.3124

Keywords:

speech acts, expressing opinions, 1 Rittoru no Namida

Abstract

Expressing opinion is a speech act that can be considered unpolite if delivered in a direct speech. Therefore, when expressing their opinions Japanese people often use various speech act constructions so that their opinions are not too straight to the point. This is done in order to respect and maintain the interlocutor’s feeling. In this study, the author examines speech acts expressing opinions in everyday conversation by looking at the construction used and its meaning. This research is limited to speech acts expressing opinions or facts in conversations on 1 Rittoru no Namida drama series. The method that used in this reseach is descriptive method. From the results of the study it was found that when expressing opinions or facts, speakers in the drama series 1 Rittoru no Namida used various constructions. The most widely used construction is guess construction. In addition, the construction of approval requests construction, avoidance construction, considerations construction, and elliptical construction are also used on the conversations.

 

References

Austin, J.L. 1962. How To Do Things With Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aziz, Aminudin E. 2000. “Aspek-aspek Budaya yang Terlupakan dalam Praktek Pengajaran Bahasa Asing”. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Blum–Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requestand Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Albex Publishing Corporation.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. 1978. Universals of Language Usages: Politeness Phenomena; in: Esther Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56-311.

Chaer, Abdul & Agustina, Leonie. 1995. Sosiolingusitik Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Edizal. 2001. Tutur Kata Manusia Jepang. Padang: Kayu Pasak.

Kartomihardjo, S. 1993. “Analisis Wacana dengan Penerapannya pada Beberapa Wacana” dalam Bambang Kaswanti Purwo (Ed.). PELIBA 6. Jakarta: Lembaga Bahasa Unika Atma Jaya.

Nadar, F. X. (2009). Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Rahardi, Kunjana. 2001. Alih Kode dan Campur Kode. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Rahardi, Kunjana. 2002. Sosiopragmatik. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Rahardi, Kunjana. 2007. Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : Erlangga.

Tarigan, Guntur. 1990. Pengajaran Pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.

Wijana, Putu. 1996. Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Wijana, I Dewa Putu. 2004. Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi offset.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-17

How to Cite

Martawijaya, A. P. (2019). Analisis Tindak Tutur Menyatakan Pendapat dalam Drama Seri “1 Rittoru No Namida”. Journal of Japanese Language Education and Linguistics, 3(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.18196/jjlel.3124

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): Februari

Section

Articles

License

Copyright

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, social media account, or on their website) after the article getting published in the journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

License

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
 
Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.