Evaluation of Maturity Level of the Electronic based Government System in the Department of Industry and Commerce of Banjar Regency

Authors

  • M. Rizeki Yuda Saputra Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta
  • Wing Wahyu Winarno School of Economics (STIE) YKPN Yogyakarta
  • Henderi Henderi Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta
  • Syahrial Shaddiq (SCOPUS ID: 57193708800), Universitas Islam Indonesia (UII), Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.1532

Keywords:

Domain 3 SPBE Services, CMM/CMMI Development, Process Roadmap, Process Area.

Abstract

This research was conducted to determine the progress achieved and provide suggestions for the implementation of the EBGS service domain in the Banjar Regency Industry and Trade Office. The Electronic Based Government System (EBGS) assessment structure is specific to the Domain 3 EBGS service maturity level in the capability of the function and uses the Capability Maturity Model/Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMM/CMMI) Development method. The EBGS Service domain index calculation is based on the results of data processing from 12 respondents on the EBGS questionnaire, then CMMI Roadmap is mapped based on the EBGS service domain which has the highest conformity value used as the most suitable roadmap, which in this study is the Process Roadmap which then measures the level of maturity of each process area (Process Area Organizational Process Focus, Process Area Organizational Focus Definition, Process Area Measurement and Analysis, Process Area Causal Analysis and Resolution, Process Area Process and Product Quality Assurance). Recommendations are given based on the results of calculating the level of maturity of each Process Area so that the suggestions given can be used as appropriate and sustainable corrective measures for the relevant agencies.

References

F. Iannacci, A. P. Seepma, C. de Blok, and A. Resca, “Reappraising maturity models in e-Government research: The trajectory-turning point theory,” J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 310–329, Sep. 2019.

I. Keshta, “A model for defining project lifecycle phases: Implementation of CMMI level 2 specific practice,” J. King Saud Univ. - Comput. Inf. Sci., no. xxxx, Nov. 2019.

F. Selleri Silva et al., “Using CMMI together with agile software development: A systematic review,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 58, pp. 20–43, Feb. 2015.

M. Staples, M. Niazi, R. Jeffery, A. Abrahams, P. Byatt, and R. Murphy, “An exploratory study of why organizations do not adopt CMMI,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 883–895, Jun. 2007.

Y. Sun and X. (Frank) Liu, “Business-oriented software process improvement based on CMMI using QFD,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 79–91, Jan. 2010.

C.-H. Cheng, J.-R. Chang, and C.-Y. Kuo, “A CMMI appraisal support system based on a fuzzy quantitative benchmarks model,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 4550–4558, Apr. 2011.

Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42-50. 2009.

Al-Sebie, M., & Irani, Z. Technical and organisational challenges facing transactional e-government systems: an empirical study. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 2(3), 247-276. 2005.

Layne, K., & Lee, J. Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government information quarterly, 18(2), 122-136. 2001.

Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. Citizen's adoption of an e-government system: Validating extended social cognitive theory (SCT). Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 172-181. 2015.

Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), 549-568. 2017.

Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. A., & Rose, G. M. Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic markets, 12(3), 157-162. 2002.

Lambrinoudakis, C., Gritzalis, S., Dridi, F., & Pernul, G. Security requirements for e-government services: a methodological approach for developing a common PKI-based security policy. Computer communications, 26(16), 1873-1883. 2003.

Fang, Z. E-government in digital era: concept, practice, and development. International journal of the Computer, the Internet and management, 10(2), 1-22. 2002.

Alshomrani, S., & Qamar, S. Cloud based e-government: benefits and challenges. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering, 4(6), 1-7. 2013.

Heeks, R. e-Government as a Carrier of Context. Journal of Public Policy, 25(1), 51-74. 2005.

Ozkan, S., & Kanat, I. E. e-Government adoption model based on theory of planned behavior: Empirical validation. Government Information Quarterly, 28(4), 503-513. 2011.

Hwang, M. S., Li, C. T., Shen, J. J., & Chu, Y. P. Challenges in e-government and security of information. Information & Security, 15(1), 9-20. 2004.

Heeks, R. e-Government in Africa: Promise and practice. Information polity, 7(2, 3), 97-114. 2002.

Lin, F., Fofanah, S. S., & Liang, D. Assessing citizen adoption of e-Government initiatives in Gambia: A validation of the technology acceptance model in information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 271-279. 2011.

Siau, K., & Long, Y. Synthesizing e‐government stage models–a meta‐synthesis based on meta‐ethnography approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2005

Kumar, M., & Sinha, O. P. M-government–mobile technology for e-government. In International conference on e-government, India (pp. 294-301). 2007.

Ebrahim, Z., & Irani, Z. E‐government adoption: architecture and barriers. Business process management journal. 2005.

Chutimaskul, W., Funilkul, S., & Chongsuphajaisiddhi, V. The quality framework of e-government development. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance (pp. 105-109). December, 2008.

Chan, C. M., Hackney, R., Pan, S. L., & Chou, T. C.. Managing e-Government system implementation: a resource enactment perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(5), 529-541. 2011

Mnjama, N., & Wamukoya, J. E‐government and records management: an assessment tool for e‐records readiness in government. The Electronic Library. 2007.

Zhou, Z., & Hu, C. Study on the e-government security risk management. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 8(5), 208-213. 2008.

Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. The effects of e‐government on trust and confidence in government. Public administration review, 66(3), 354-369. 2006.

Kushchu, I., & Kuscu, H. From E-government to M-government: Facing the Inevitable. In the 3rd European Conference on e-Government (pp. 253-260). MCIL Trinity College Dublin Ireland. July, 2003.

Gupta, M. P., & Jana, D. E-government evaluation: A framework and case study. Government Information quarterly, 20(4), 365-387. 2003.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-27

How to Cite

[1]
M. R. Y. Saputra, W. W. Winarno, H. Henderi, and S. Shaddiq, “Evaluation of Maturity Level of the Electronic based Government System in the Department of Industry and Commerce of Banjar Regency”, J Robot Control (JRC), vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 156–161, Apr. 2020.

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 5 (2020): September

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 

This journal is based on the work at https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jrc under license from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free to:

  1. Share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
  2. Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even comercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms, which include the following:

  1. Attribution. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. ShareAlike. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  3. No additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

 

• Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Creative Commons License
JRC is licensed under an International License