Impact of Traditional Environmental Management Measures and Ecological Product Diversification on MSME Performance: Evidence of the Batik Industry in Central Java, Indonesia

Kesi Widjajanti, Eviatiwi Kusumaningtyas Sugiyanto

Abstract


Research aims: This research aims to investigate the influence of traditional environmental management practices on corporate performance and determine the mediating role of ecological product diversification in this regard.
Design/Methodology/Approach: To achieve these objectives, a research design was developed and tested using a sample of 138 micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) operating in the batik industry in Central Java, Indonesia. Observation data were then analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) utilizing Amos software.
Research findings: The analysis results demonstrated that traditional environmental management and ecological product diversification had a direct positive impact on the performance of small and medium enterprises. However, these results did not confirm the mediating role of ecological product diversification.
Theoretical contribution/Originality: This study provides convincing evidence regarding the impact of environmentally friendly product diversification on MSME performance. Therefore, MSMEs, especially those operating in the batik industry, are encouraged to diversify environmentally friendly products to increase competitiveness and adapt to people's concern for the environment in the current era (green economy).
Practitioners/Policy implications: It is acknowledged that the overall results obtained from this research provide a significant contribution to the understanding of the importance of environmental management practices and environmentally-friendly product diversification to increase business efficiency in the context of MSMEs.
Research limitations/Implications: This study had a limited scope and only covered the Central Java region. Subsequent research can further expand the scope of the research field.


Keywords


Traditional Environmental Management; Ecological Product Diversification; Performance; MSMEs; Batik Industry; Central Java; Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afum, E., Gao, Y., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., & Sun, Z. (2021). Nexus between lean operations, eco-product innovativeness, social, green and business performances: An empirical evidence from Ghanaian manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(8), 1557-1577. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-09-2020-0352

Al-Shami, S., & Rashid, N. (2022). A holistic model of dynamic capabilities and environment management system towards eco-product innovation and sustainability in automobile firms. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(2), 402-416. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-04-2020-0217

Arda, O. A., Bayraktar, E., & Tatoglu, E. (2019). How do integrated quality and environmental management practices affect firm performance? Mediating roles of quality performance and environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2190

Blanco, E., Rey-Maquieira, J., & Lozano, J. (2009). The economic impacts of voluntary environmental performance of firms: A critical review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(3), 462-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2008.00569.x

Boakye, D. J., Tingbani, I., Ahinful, G. S., & Nsor-Ambala, R. (2021). The relationship between environmental management performance and financial performance of firms listed in the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 124034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124034

Budiyanto, S., Anies, A., Purnaweni, H., & Sunoko, H. R. (2018). Environmental analysis of the impacts of batik waste water pollution on the quality of dug well water in the batik industrial center of jenggot pekalongan city. E3S Web of Conferences, 31. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183109008

Buffa, F., Franch, M., & Rizio, D. (2018). Environmental management practices for sustainable business models in small and medium sized hotel enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 656-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.143

Cai, W., & Li, G. (2018). The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109

Cainelli, G., Mazzanti, M., & Zoboli, R. (2011). Environmental innovations, complementarity and local/global cooperation: Evidence from North-East Italian industry. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 11(3-4), 328-368. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTPM.2011.042090

Chung, K.-T. (2016). Azo dyes and human health: a review. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 34, 233-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10590501.2016.1236602

Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 471-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0

David, F. R. (2011). Strategic management concepts and cases. Pearson.

Dey, P. K., Petridis, N. E., Petridis, K., Malesios, C., Nixon, J. D., & Ghosh, S. K. (2018). Environmental management and corporate social responsibility practices of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 687-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.201

Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, Á., & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2015). Eco-innovation: Insights from a literature review. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 17(1), 6-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2015.1011060

Donaldson. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229249

Eukeria, M., & Favourate, S. (2014). Diversification as a corporate strategy and its effect on firm performance: a study of zimbabwean listed conglomerates in the food and beverages sector. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(5), 182-195. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v6n5p182

Fernando, Y., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Wah, W. X. (2019). Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: does service capability matter? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 8-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.031

Furlan Matos Alves, M. W., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Kannan, D., & Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J. (2017). Contingency theory, climate change, and low-carbon operations management. Supply Chain Management, 22(3), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2016-0311

Geng, D., Lai, K. hung, & Zhu, Q. (2021). Eco-innovation and its role for performance improvement among Chinese small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 231(1), 107869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107869

Grazzi, M., Sasso, S., & Kemp, R. (2019). A conceptual framework to measure green innovation in Latin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0002082

Hansen, E. G., & Klewitz, J. (2012). The role of an sme's green strategy in public-private eco-innovation initiatives: the case of ecoprofit. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 25(4), 451-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2012.10593584

Hojnik, J., & Ruzzier, M. (2016). What drives eco-innovation? A review of an emerging literature. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 19, 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.006

Huang, X., Tan, B. L., & Ding, X. (2015). An exploratory survey of green supply chain management in Chinese manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises: Pressures and drivers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(1), 80-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-05-2012-0053

Kasiri, M. B., & Safapour, S. (2014). Natural dyes and antimicrobials for green treatment of textiles. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 12(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-013-0426-2

Lellis, B., Fávaro-Polonio, C. Z., Pamphile, J. A., & Polonio, J. C. (2019). Effects of textile dyes on health and the environment and bioremediation potential of living organisms. Biotechnology Research and Innovation, 3(2), 275-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biori.2019.09.001

Lin, C., & Chang, C. C. (2015). The effect of technological diversification on organizational performance: An empirical study of S&P 500 manufacturing firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90(PB), 575-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.014

Lutfi, A., Alqudah, H., Alrawad, M., Alshira'h, A. F., Alshirah, M. H., Almaiah, M. A., ... & Hassan, M. F. (2023). Green environmental management system to support environmental performance: what factors influence smes to adopt green innovations? Sustainability, 15(13), 10645. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310645

Martuti, N. K. T., Hidayah, I., Margunani, M., & Alafima, R. B. (2020). Organic material for clean production in the batik industry: A case study of natural batik Semarang, Indonesia. Recycling, 5(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling5040028

Molina‐Azorín, J. F., Claver‐Cortés, E., López‐Gamero, M. D., & Tarí, J. J. (2009). Green management and financial performance: a literature review. Management Decision, 47(7), 1080-1100. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910978313

Naqsyabandi, S., Riani, E., & Suprihatin, S. (2018). Impact of batik wastewater pollution on macrobenthic community in Pekalongan River. AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5064125

Ndubisi, N. O., Zhai, X. (Amy), & Lai, K. hung. (2021). Small and medium manufacturing enterprises and Asia's sustainable economic development. International Journal of Production Economics, 233, 107971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107971

Njuguna, V. N. (2018). Influence of product diversification strategy on performance of non-financial firms listed at the Nairobi securities exchange, Kenya. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 6(6), 60-83.

Oyedijo, A. (2012). Effects of product-market diversification strategy on corporate financial performance and growth: an empirical study of some companies in Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(3), 199-210.

Pereira, Á., & Vence, X. (2012). Key business factors for eco-innovation: An overview of recent firm-level empirical studies. Cuadernos de Gestion, 12, 73-103. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.110308ap

Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage (chapter 5 in competitive advantage book). Journal of Business Strategy, 5(3), 60-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb039075

Rennings, K., & Rammer, C. (2011). The impact of regulation-driven environmental innovation on innovation success and firm performance. Industry & Innovation, 18(3), 255-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.561027

Ryszko, A. (2016). Proactive environmental strategy, technological eco-innovation and firm performance-case of Poland. Sustainability, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020156

Salim, H. K., Padfield, R., Hansen, S. B., Mohamad, S. E., Yuzir, A., Syayuti, K., Tham, M. H., & Papargyropoulou, E. (2018). Global trends in environmental management system and ISO14001 research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 645-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.017

Valdez-Juárez, L. E., & Castillo-Vergara, M. (2021). Technological capabilities, open innovation, and eco-innovation: Dynamic capabilities to increase corporate performance of smes. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010008

Widjajanti, K. Nuryakin, N, & Sugiyanto, E. K. (2020). The synergy between academic support, government regulation, business sector, and civil society to enhancing innovation ecosystem Indonesian smes. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(5), 108. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0092

Widjajanti, K. Widodo. (2016). Improving organizational innovation by human capital, knowledge sharing and organizational learning base. International Business Management, 10(9), 1599-1609.

Widjajanti, K., Prihantini, F. N., & Wijayanti, R. (2022). Sustainable development of business with canvas business model approach: empirical study on msmes batik blora, Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170334

Wiengarten, F., Pagell, M., & Fynes, B. (2012). Supply chain environmental investments in dynamic industries: Comparing investment and performance differences with static industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 541-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.03.011

Yaacob, M. R., Ismail, M., Zakaria, M. N., Zainol, F. A., & Zain, N. F. M. (2015). Environmental awareness of batik entrepreneurs in Kelantan, Malaysia-an early insight. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(4), 338-347. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v5-i4/1576

Zhu, Q., Qu, Y., Geng, Y., & Fujita, T. (2017). A comparison of regulatory awareness and green supply chain management practices among Chinese and Japanese manufacturers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1888

Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2018). Regulatory policy awareness and environmental supply chain cooperation in China: a regulatory-exchange-theoretic perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2017.2734940




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/mb.v14i2.19301

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Kesi Widjajanti, Eviatiwi Kusumaningtyas Sugiyanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Office: 

Ruang Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/mb - E-mail: mabis@umy.ac.id
Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 118)

Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)