Email this article 
The Debt Policy and Performance of State-Owned Companies in Indonesia
Abstract
Research Aims: This research aims to explore the factors influencing debt policy in "red-license plate" companies in Indonesia from 2010 to 2020.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The research method used is empirical studies to achieve the study's objectives.
Research Findings: The first analysis result showed that their debt policy was significantly determined by collateral value of assets, profitability, company size, business risk, liquidity. However, those factors partly clarified the policies, whereas other factors outside the observation defined the rest. The result of the second analysis meanwhile showed that the debt policy has significant negative impact on the company performance both long-term and short-term period.
Theoretical Contribution/Originality: Several research strategies that may be useful in this respect are discussed, and a typology of constructs is proposed on the basis of this analysis is Short term debt policy, Long term debt policy, and The thermal design power are as latent variables; the collateral value of assets, Profitability, Company size, Business risk, Growth opportunity, and Liquidity are construct variables.
Practitioners/Policy Implications: The first stage of analysis is intended to examine the factors influencing debt policy, both total debt policy, short term debt policy, and long-term debt.
Research Limitations/Implications: Considering the limited amount of data available, this study conducts a risk assessment based on historical data only. A more complete identification of risks and vulnerabilities will include a forward-looking assessment using sensitivity analysis, scenarios, and testing of debt policies on "state-owned" companies in Indonesia from 2010 to 2020 and the impact of debt policies on the financial performance of companies during that period. We will next explain the methods used to achieve the objectives of the study. Furthermore, it further describes the results of research and discussion and winds up with conclusions and suggestions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ainul F., Hadi P., Suryo Budi S., & Hardiyanto W. (2023). Determinan Kebijakan Utang (Studi Kasus Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara (Bumn) Di Indonesia Periode 2019- 2021). JEMSI, 9(3), 565-576. https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v9i3.1105.
Amran, E. F. (2020) The Effect of Debt Policy on the Financial Performance of Manufacturing Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013-2017. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaanahaan, 11(2). https://ojs.unitas-pdg.ac.id/index.php/manajemen/article/view/565.
Company Profile. (2021). PLN Persero. https://web.pln.co.id/statics/uploads/2021/08/Company-Profile-PLN-082021.pdf
Dwilaksono, H. (2010). Effect of Short and Long Term Debt To Profitability in the Mining Industry Listed In JSX. Ibusiness and Entrepeneurial Review. 10(1), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.25105/ber.v10i1.18.
Fahmi, I. (2014). Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan dan Pasar Modal. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
Gemala P., Yudo K., & Nurul M. (2021). Kinerja Keuangan PT Balai Pustaka (PERSERO) Sesudah dan Sebelum Merger Berdasakan Surat Keputusan Menteri BUMN Nomor : KEP-100/MBU/2002. JISAMAR. 5(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.52362/jisamar.v5i1.328.
Hendry H., Karyana Hu; Marshelia M. (2012). Pengaruh Strategi Pemasaran Terhadap Peningkatan Penjualan Perusahaan. Binus Journal. 3(2), 12. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/167985-ID-pengaruh-strategi-pemasaran-terhadap-pen.pdf.
Hery. (2016). Analisis Laporan Keuangan Integrated and Comprehensive Edition. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Indonesia Siap Ambil Alih Teknologi-Manajemen Inalum. (2013). Antarnews. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/375399/indonesia-siap-ambil-alih-teknologi-manajemen-inalum.
Jenny A., & Asep M. (2022). Pengaruh Profitabilitas dan Kebijakan Utang terhadap Nilai Perusahaan: Studi Pada Perusahaan BUMN yang Terdaftar di BEI. TDEJ, 1(1). 1-12. https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/tdej/article/view/7208/3497.
Jensen M. C & Meckling W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firms: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3, 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
Kazumi W. (2020). Outliers in Official Statistics, Theory and Practice of Survey. Japanese Journal of Statistics and Data Science. 3, 669-691. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42081-020-00091-y.
Leavy P. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford: University Press.
Merpati Pailit. (2022). CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20220607140705-17-345001/merpati-pailit-utang-rp-109-t-ekuitas-minus-rp-19-t.
Modigliani F., & Miller M. H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. American Economic Review. 48(4), 261-297. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809766.
Nisrina M., & Herawaty V. (2016). Peran Intellectual Capital Disclosure sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Perataan Laba, Corporate Governance, Kesempatan Bertumbuh, Persistensi Laba, dan Leverage terhadap Keinformatifan Laba. Jurnal TEKUN, 8(1), 118-146, https://dx.doi.org/10.22441/tekun.v7i1.646.
Pao H. T., Bohdan P., & Tenpao L. (2003). The Determinants capital Structure Choice Usinglinier Models: High Technology vs. Traditional Corporations. Journal of The Academy of Business and Economics. 18(1), 15-32. https://iceb.johogo.com/proceedings/2001/pdf/349.PDF.
Rita K., Nurul Hilmi A., & Iskandar B. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility's (CSR) Impact on Financial Performance: Moderating Effects of Earnings Management and Leverage. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis. 13(2), 224-234. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/3160312.
Stewart C. M., & Nicholas S. M. (1984). The Capital Structure Puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03646.x.
Suhartono S. (2015). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Struktur Modal, dan Ketepatan Waktu Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan Terhadap Koefisien Respon Laba yang Dimoderasi Konservatisme Akuntansi (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2010. Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 22(2), 189-211. https://jurnal.kwikkiangie.ac.id/index.php/JEP/article/view/207/52.
Yurinawari, W., & Andayani, A. (2017). Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan, Ukuran Perusahaan dan Jaminan Aset Terhadap Kebijakan Dividen. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi, 6(9), 1-20. http://jurnalmahasiswa.stiesia.ac.id/index.php/jira/article/view/541/553.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/mb.v15i1.20285
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Mangasi Sinurat, Rico Nur Ilham, Irada Sinta, Shabir Ahmad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Office:
Ruang Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis,
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/mb - E-mail: mabis@umy.ac.id
Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 118)
Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)