Peta Penggunaan E-Learning Oleh Dosen Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Pasca Hibah Spada

Meika Kurnia Puji Rahayu

Abstract


This study aims to analyse the use of e-learning among lecturers of the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta after the implementation of an online lecture policy and SPADA grants. This research is based on the fact that the use of e-learning by UMY lecturers is not comparable with the investment that has been made. There are still many lecturers who have not been optimal in using e-learning to improve the quality of teaching. The research subjects were lecturers of the Faculty of Economics and Business with a sample of 65 people. Data was collected using documentation techniques and physical artefacts. Data analysis was carried out by qualitative-descriptive method. The results show that there were significant changes in the number of lecturers who have e-learning accounts after the implementation of university policy in term of use of e-learning in teaching and learning. However, this has not been followed by an optimal use of e-learning since most lecturers use e-learning only to upload lecture material in PowerPoint. A few of the respondents used e-learning for online discussions or exams.


Keywords


use of e-learning; SPADA grant; lecturers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adewole-Odeshi, E. (2014). Attitude of Students Towards E-learning in South-West Nigerian Universities: An Application of Technology Acceptance Model. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2014(1), 0_1.

Al-Adwan, A., Al-Adwan, A., & Smedley, J. (2013). Exploring Students Acceptance of E-Learning Using Technology Acceptance Model in Jordanian Universities. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9(2), 4.

Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In K. J. & B. J. (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Berlin, Heidelber: New York: Springer-Verlag.

Alavi, M., Wheeler, B. C., & Valacich, J. S. (1995). Using IT to Reengineer Business Education: An Exploratory Investigation of Collaborative Telelearning. MIS Quarterly, 293-312.

Alavi, M., Yoo, Y., & Vogel, D. R. (1997). Using Information Technology to Add Value to Management Education. Academy of management Journal, 40(6), 1310-1333.

Ali, G., Haolader, F. A., & Muhammad, K. (2013). The Role of ICT to Make Teaching-Learning Effective in Higher Institutions of Learning in Uganda. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2(8), 4061-4073.

Anggraeni, M. K. P. R. D. (2017). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Use in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Business Schools. A Comparative Study. (Doctoral), Charles Darwin University, Darwin.

Bates, T., & Sangrà, A. (2011). Managing Technology in Higher Education: Strategies for Transforming Teaching and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Behara, R. S., & Davis, M. M. (2015). Navigating Disruptive Innovation in Undergraduate Business Education. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 13(3), 305-326.

Blanca, H., Julio, J., & Jose, M. M. (2008). Business Acceptance of Information Technology: Expanding TAM Using Industry Sector and Technological Compatibility. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), 4(4), 62-79. doi:10.4018/jeis.2008100105

Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why Hasn’t Technology Disrupted Academics’ Teaching Practices? Understanding Resistance To Change Through The Lens Of Activity Theory. Computers & Education, 50(2), 475-490.

Carr, T. (2010). An Examination of Leadership Styles in Implementing Instructional Technology: A Case Study to Examine the Elementary School Principal Perspective. (Doctor of Education), Northcentral University, Prescott Valey, Arizona.

Chase, N. M., & Clegg, B. (2013). Effects Of Email Utilization On Higher Education Professionals. In User Perception and Influencing Factors of Technology in Everyday Life (pp. 233-247). IGI Global.

Churchill, D. (2007). Towards A Useful Classification Of Learning Objects. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(5), 479-497.

Chuttur, M. Y. (2009). Overview Of The Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments And Future Directions. Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37), 9-37.

Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and Results. (Ph.D.), Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.

Dulcic, Z., Pavlic, D., & Silic, I. (2012). Evaluating the Intended Use of Decision Support System (DSS) by Applying Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Business Organizations in Croatia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1565-1575. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1143

Edmunds, R., Thorpe, M., & Conole, G. (2012). Student attitudes towards and use of ICT in course study, work and social activity: A technology acceptance model approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 71-84. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01142.

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational technology research and development, 47(4), 47-61.

Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine faculty use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 210-232.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. An Introduction to Theory and Research. Canada: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Fry, N., & Love, N. (2011). Business Lecturers’ Perceptions and Interactions with The Virtual Learning Environment. International Journal of Management Education, 9(4), 51-56.

Fu, J. S. (2013). ICT in Education: A Critical Literature Review and Its Implications. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9(1), 112.

Gan, C. L., & Balakrishnan, V. (2014). Determinants of mobile wireless technology for promoting interactivity in lecture sessions: An empirical analysis. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 159–181.

Ha, S., & Stoel, L. (2009). Consumer E-Shopping Acceptance: Antecedents In A Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Business Research, 62(5), 565-571.

Hernández, B., Jiménez, J., & Martín, M. (2008). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Include the IT Decision-Maker: A Study of Business Management Software. Technovation, 28(3), 112-121. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.11.002

Hudson, K. (2010). Working Together: The Role of Collaborations in Promoting the Use of Academic Technologies in Higher Education. (3427536 Ed.D.), University of Massachusetts Amherst, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/816503205?accountid=10424 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database.

Iqbal, S., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2015). An Investigation of University Student Readiness towards M-learning using Technology Acceptance Model. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(4).

Jan, A. U., & Contreras, V. (2011). Technology Acceptance Model for the Use of Information Technology in Universities. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 845-851. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.009

Kabir, Y. (2012). Impact of information and communication technology on teaching of business education courses in colleges of education in Nigeria. (Master of Education), Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria.

Khan, M., Hossain, S., Hasan, M., & Clement, C. K. (2012). Barriers to the Introduction of ICT into Education in Developing Countries: The Example of Bangladesh. International Journal of instruction, 5(2).

King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A Meta-Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model. Information & management, 43(6), 740-755.

Kirkup, G., & Kirkwood, A. (2005). Information And Communications Technologies (ICT) in Higher Education Teaching—A Tale Of Gradualism Rather Than Revolution. Learning, Media and Technology, 30(2), 185-199.

Lane, L. M. (2008). Toolbox or trap? Course Management Systems and Pedagogy. Educause Quarterly, 31(2), 4.

Lane, M., & Stagg, A. (2014). University Staff Adoption of IPad: An Empirical Study Using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 18(3), 53-74.

Leidner, D. E., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical View. MIS Quarterly, 265-291.

Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81-95. doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1

Nawaz, A., & Khan, M. Z. (2012). Issues of Technical Support for e-Learning Systems in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS), 4(2), 38.

Noguera, J. H., & Watson, E. F. (2004). Effectiveness of Using an Enterprise System to Teach Process-Centered Concepts in Business Education. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17(1), 56-74. doi:10.1108/09576050410510953

Noor-Ul-Amin, S. (2013). An Effective Use of ICT for Education and Learning by Drawing On Worldwide Knowledge, Research, and Experience: ICT as A Change Agent for Education. Scholarly Journal of Education, 2(4), 38-45.

Pasaoglu, D. (2011). Analysis of ERP Usage with Technology Acceptance Model. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 3(2), 157.

Penmenristekdikti (Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia) (2015). Diunduh dari https://img.akademik.ugm.ac.id/unduh/2015/PERMENRISTEKDIKTI_ Nomor_44_Tahun_2015_SNPT.pdf

Persaud, B. (2006). School Administrators' Perspective On Their Leadership Role In Technology Integration. (Doctor of Philosophy Education), Walden University.

Plouffe, C. R., Hulland, J. S., & Vandenbosch, M. (2001). Research Report: Richness versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions—Understanding Merchant Adoption of A Smart Card-Based Payment System. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 208-222.

Raman, A. (2011). The Usage of Technology among Education Students in University Utara Malaysia: An Application of Extended Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 7(3), 4.

Redmann, D. H., & Kotrlik, J. W. (2004). Technology Integration into the Teaching-Learning Process by Business Education Teachers. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 46(2), 76-91.

Reigeluth, C. M., Watson, W. R., Watson, S. S. L., Dutta, P., Chen, Z., & Powell, N. D. (2008). Roles For Technology In The Information-Age Paradigm Of Education: Learning Management Systems. Educational Technology, 32-39.

Renes, S. L., & Strange, A. T. (2011). Using Technology to Enhance Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education, 36(3), 203-213. doi:10.1007/s10755-010-9167-3

Rienties, B., & Townsend, D. (2012). Integrating ICT in Business Education: Using TPACK to Reflect on Two Course Redesigns. In Learning at the Crossroads of Theory and Practice (pp. 141-156). Springer, Dordrecht.

Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

Sarkar, S. (2012). The Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Higher Education for the 21st century. Science, 1(1).

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Shahrabi, M. A., Ahaninjan, A., Nourbakhsh, H., Ashlubolagh, M. A., Abdolmaleki, J., & Mohamadi, M. (2013). Assessing Psychometric Reliability and Validity of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Among Faculty Members at Shahid Beheshti University. Management Science Letters, 3(8), 2295-2300. doi:10.5267/j.msl.2013.07.014

Snyder, K. D. (2003). Ropes, Poles, and Space: Active Learning in Business Education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4(2), 159-167. Doi: 10.1177/1469787403004002004

Sugiyono, P. (2015). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Šumak, B., HeričKo, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A Meta-Analysis of E-Learning Technology Acceptance: The Role of User Types and E-Learning Technology Types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067-2077.

Thomas, C. D. (2011). Factors Affecting Faculty Use of Technology-Enhanced Instruction at Research Universities. (Doctor of Philosophy), the University of Texas Austin.

Thomas, P. H., Jr. (2012). Predicting Information Technology Adoption in Small Businesses: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Academy of Information and Management Sciences Journal, 15(1), 37.

Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., & Budgen, D. (2010). Does The Technology Acceptance Model Predict Actual Use? A Systematic Literature Review. Information and Software Technology, 52(5), 463-479. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2), 273-315.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204.

Watty, K., McKay, J., & Ngo, L. (2015). Innovators or Inhibitors? Accounting Faculty Resistance to New Educational Technologies in Higher Education. Journal of Accounting Education. doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.03.003

Weisblat, G. Z., & McClellan, J. (2017). The Disruptive Innovation of Self-Organized Learning Environments. Childhood Education, 93(4), 309-315.

Wright, R. P., Paroutis, S. E., & Blettner, D. P. (2013). How Useful Are the Strategic Tools We Teach in Business Schools? Journal of Management Studies, 50(1), 92-125. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01082.

Wu, K., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q., Tan, X., & Zheng, H. (2011). A Meta-Analysis of The Impact of Trust on Technology Acceptance Model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type. International Journal of Information Management, 31(6), 572-581.

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (Vol. 5.). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.

Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology Acceptance: A Meta-Analysis of the TAM: Part 2. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2(3), 281-304. doi: 10.1108/17465660710834462




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/mb.9264

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis




Office: 

Ruang Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/mb - E-mail: mabis@umy.ac.id
Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 118)

Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)