Enhanced Temperature Control of Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors Using QIO-based 2-DoF PID Controller
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.v6i3.26586Keywords:
Two-Degree-of-Freedom (2-DOF) PID Controller, Quadratic Interpolation Optimization, Metaheuristics, Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor, Temperature ControlAbstract
Accurate temperature control of continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) remains a major challenge due to the nonlinear dynamics and inherent time delay of the system. Conventional proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers often struggle to maintain optimal performance under such complexities, highlighting the need for more advanced control strategies. In this study, a two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) PID controller is designed and optimized using the quadratic interpolation optimization (QIO) to enhance temperature regulation in CSTRs. The proposed approach aims to minimize steady-state error, settling time, and overshoot. To implement this method, the nonlinear model of the CSTR is linearized around a stable operating point, and the controller parameters are tuned by minimizing a composite cost function consisting of normalized overshoot and instantaneous error. Simulation results demonstrate that the QIO-based 2-DOF PID controller significantly outperforms other metaheuristic approaches such as differential evolution, particle swarm optimization, slime mould algorithm, and greater cane rat algorithm. Furthermore, comparisons with recent works reveal substantial improvements in rise time, settling time, and steady-state accuracy.
References
D. Izci et al., “A new intelligent control strategy for CSTH temperature regulation based on the starfish optimization algorithm,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, p. 12327, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96621-3.
A. Sinha and R. K. Mishra, “Temperature regulation in a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor using event triggered sliding mode control,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, pp. 401–406, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.05.060.
A. M. Abdel-hamed, A. Y. Abdelaziz, and A. El-Shahat, “Design of a 2DOF-PID Control Scheme for Frequency/Power Regulation in a Two-Area Power System Using Dragonfly Algorithm with Integral-Based Weighted Goal Objective,” Energies (Basel), vol. 16, p. 486, 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16010486.
M. Jabari and A. Rad, "Optimization of Speed Control and Reduction of Torque Ripple in Switched Reluctance Motors Using Metaheuristic Algorithms Based PID and FOPID Controllers at the Edge," in Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1526-1538, August 2025, doi: 10.26599/TST.2024.9010021.
R. K. Sahu, S. Panda, U. K. Rout, and D. K. Sahoo, “Teaching learning based optimization algorithm for automatic generation control of power system using 2-DOF PID controller,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 77, pp. 287–301, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.11.082.
M. Jabari, S. Ekinci, D. Izci, M. Bajaj, and I. Zaitsev, “Efficient DC motor speed control using a novel multi-stage FOPD(1 + PI) controller optimized by the Pelican optimization algorithm,” Sci Rep., vol. 14, p. 22442, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73409-5.
M. Jabari, S. Ekinci, D. Izci, M. Bajaj, V. Blazek, and L. Prokop, “Efficient pressure regulation in nonlinear shell-and-tube steam condensers via a Novel TDn(1 + PIDn) controller and DCSA algorithm,” Sci Rep., vol. 15, p. 2090, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86107-7.
M. Jabari, D. Izci, S. Ekinci, M. Bajaj, and I. Zaitsev, “Performance analysis of DC-DC Buck converter with innovative multi-stage PIDn(1+PD) controller using GEO algorithm,” Sci Rep., vol. 14, p. 25612, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77395-6.
S. Das and P. N. Suganthan, "Differential Evolution: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art," in IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 4-31, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2010.2059031.
D. Wang, D. Tan, and L. Liu, “Particle swarm optimization algorithm: an overview,” Soft Comput., vol. 22, pp. 387–408, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00500-016-2474-6.
S. Li, H. Chen, M. Wang, A.A. Heidari, and S. Mirjalili, “Slime mould algorithm: A new method for stochastic optimization,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 111, pp. 300–323, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2020.03.055.
J. O. Agushaka, A. E. Ezugwu, A. K. Saha, J. Pal, L. Abualigah, and S. Mirjalili, “Greater cane rat algorithm (GCRA): A nature-inspired metaheuristic for optimization problems,” Heliyon, vol. 10, p. e31629, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31629.
W. Zhao, L. Wang, Z. Zhang, S. Mirjalili, N. Khodadadi, and Q. Ge, “Quadratic Interpolation Optimization (QIO): A new optimization algorithm based on generalized quadratic interpolation and its applications to real-world engineering problems,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 417, p. 116446, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2023.116446.
S. Ekinci, D. Izci, V. Gider, M. Bajaj, V. Blazek, and L. Prokop, “Quadratic interpolation optimization-based 2DoF-PID controller design for highly nonlinear continuous stirred-tank heater process,” Sci Rep., vol. 15, p. 16324, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01379-3.
S. Ekinci, D. Izci, V. Gider, L. Abualigah, M. Bajaj, and I. Zaitsev, Efficient control strategy for electric furnace temperature regulation using quadratic interpolation optimization,” Sci Rep., vol. 15, p. 154, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84085-w.
D. Izci, S. Ekinci, E. Çelik, M. Bajaj, V. Blazek, and L. Prokop, “Dynamic load frequency control in Power systems using a hybrid simulated annealing based Quadratic Interpolation Optimizer,” Sci Rep., vol. 14, p. 26011, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77247-3.
F. Dao, Y. Zeng, Y. Zou, and J. Qian, “Fault diagnosis method for hydropower unit via the incorporation of chaotic quadratic interpolation optimized deep learning model,” Measurement, vol. 237, p. 115199, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115199.
A. S. A. Bayoumi, R. A. El Sehiemy, M. El-Kemary, and A. Abaza, “Advanced extraction of PV parameters’ models based on electric field impacts on semiconductor conductivity using QIO algorithm,” Sci Rep., vol. 14, p. 15397, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65091-4.
N. H. Khan, Y. Wang, R. Jamal, M. Ebeed, S. Kamel, G. Ali, F. Jurado, and A.-R. Youssef, “Improved quadratic interpolation optimizer for stochastic short-term hydrothermal scheduling with integration of solar PV and wind power,” Sci Rep., vol. 15, p. 11283, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86881-4.
A. Ghosh, T. Rakesh Krishnan, P. Tejaswy, A. Mandal, J. K. Pradhan, and S. Ranasingh, “Design and implementation of a 2-DOF PID compensation for magnetic levitation systems,” ISA Trans., vol. 53, pp. 1216–1222, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2014.05.015.
D. Sain, “Real-Time implementation and performance analysis of robust 2-DOF PID controller for Maglev system using pole search technique,” J Ind Inf Integr., vol. 15, pp. 183–190, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2018.11.003.
D. S. Acharya, S. K. Swain, and S. K. Mishra, “Real-Time Implementation of a Stable 2 DOF PID Controller for Unstable Second-Order Magnetic Levitation System with Time Delay,” Arab J Sci Eng., vol. 45, pp. 6311–6329, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s13369-020-04425-6.
P. E. Kamalakkannan, B. Vinoth Kumar, and M. Kalamani, “Optimal nonlinear Fractional-Order Proportional-Integral-Derivative controller design using a novel hybrid atom search optimization for nonlinear Continuously stirred Tank reactor,” Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, vol. 54, p. 102862, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102862.
A. Rani, D. Prabhakaran, and M. Thirumarimurugan, “A Novel Optimization of Fractional Order PID Controller Using Chaotic Maps Based Atomic Search Optimization for pH Control in Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor,” Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, vol. 10, pp. 3059–3087, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42417-022-00538-4.
K. R. Sundaresan and P. R. Krishnaswamy, “Estimation of time delay time constant parameters in time, frequency, and laplace domains, The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 257–262, 1978, doi: 10.1002/cjce.5450560215.
K. G. Begum, “Coot bird optimization algorithm for the temperature control of continuous stirred tank reactor process,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 18, 2023, doi: 10.1002/apj.2787.
M. Qaraad, S. Amjad, N. K. Hussein, M. A. Farag, S. Mirjalili, and M. A. Elhosseini, “Quadratic interpolation and a new local search approach to improve particle swarm optimization: Solar photovoltaic parameter estimation,” Expert Syst Appl., vol. 236, p. 121417, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121417.
S.-L. Cheng and C. Hwang, “Designing PID controllers with a minimum IAE criterion by a differential evolution algorithm,” Chem Eng Commun., vol. 170, pp. 83–115, 1998, doi: 10.1080/00986449808912737.
D. Izci, “A novel modified arithmetic optimization algorithm for power system stabilizer design,” Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, vol. 40, pp. 529–541, 2022, doi: 10.14744/sigma.2022.00056.
K. Jagatheesan, B. Anand, K. N. Dey, A. S. Ashour, and S. C. Satapathy, “Performance evaluation of objective functions in automatic generation control of thermal power system using ant colony optimization technique-designed proportional–integral–derivative controller,” Electrical Engineering, vol. 100, pp. 895–911, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00202-017-0555-x.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Serdar Ekinci, Davut Izci, Mostafa Jabari, Alfian Ma'arif

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This journal is based on the work at https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jrc under license from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free to:
- Share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even comercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms, which include the following:
- Attribution. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
• Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
JRC is licensed under an International License